Comments on: Reconciling the Eyewitness accounts http://www.mortalresurrection.com/2009/05/09/reconciling-the-eyewitness-accounts/ Unraveling the Mysteries of Mortal Resurrection Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:54:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: admin http://www.mortalresurrection.com/2009/05/09/reconciling-the-eyewitness-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-1563 admin Fri, 29 May 2009 19:51:32 +0000 http://www.mortalresurrection.com/?p=309#comment-1563 Todd, You have invested a great deal of diligent effort into this study. The initial difficulty that I see involves validation of your primary source document, <em>The Gospel of the Holy Twelve</em>. Prior to its 'discovery' by Gideon Jasper Ouseley in the nineteenth century, I can find no evidence for its existence. The rest of your analysis, I believe, stands or falls based upon the reliability of this work? In the nineteenth century men such as J.B. Lightfoot and Brooke Foss Westcott performed comprehensive research demonstrating the use of the canonical gospels in the works of Church Fathers of the first three centuries AD. If the document that you reference was extant and accepted at this time, it must also have left such evidence in the literary/historical record. It is the CONTINUOUS record of history that provides assurance of authenticity. Best Wishes, John Todd,
You have invested a great deal of diligent effort into this study. The initial difficulty that I see involves validation of your primary source document, The Gospel of the Holy Twelve. Prior to its ‘discovery’ by Gideon Jasper Ouseley in the nineteenth century, I can find no evidence for its existence. The rest of your analysis, I believe, stands or falls based upon the reliability of this work? In the nineteenth century men such as J.B. Lightfoot and Brooke Foss Westcott performed comprehensive research demonstrating the use of the canonical gospels in the works of Church Fathers of the first three centuries AD. If the document that you reference was extant and accepted at this time, it must also have left such evidence in the literary/historical record. It is the CONTINUOUS record of history that provides assurance of authenticity.

Best Wishes,

John

]]> By: todd vetter http://www.mortalresurrection.com/2009/05/09/reconciling-the-eyewitness-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-1560 todd vetter Fri, 29 May 2009 18:59:21 +0000 http://www.mortalresurrection.com/?p=309#comment-1560 You are going to want to see page 29 of this study.. actually you will want to see this whole study to see where Satan has sown bad seed in the night in the same field. After viewing page 29. view page 26 to see credibility for the validity of the written witness testimony. http://www.thedeathandresurection.com/pdf/death%20and%20resurrection%20time%20line.pdf this study covers every angle of this topic objectivly letting the historical witnesses tell the story in correlation to the prophecies, real time, and basic reality. Your either going to love this study or Hate it. God Bless You are going to want to see page 29 of this study.. actually you will want to see this whole study to see where Satan has sown bad seed in the night in the same field. After viewing page 29. view page 26 to see credibility for the validity of the written witness testimony.

http://www.thedeathandresurection.com/pdf/death%20and%20resurrection%20time%20line.pdf

this study covers every angle of this topic objectivly letting the historical witnesses tell the story in correlation to the prophecies, real time, and basic reality.

Your either going to love this study or Hate it.

God Bless

]]>